That's what most people's experiences happened to be, but if your calibration target metamerises, then the resulting profile will be correct only for the target itself, and perhaps for a similar ink/paper combination as well. It has little to do with printer profiles and nothing to do with scanner profiles. I have never been able to get good results using a scanner with a florescent lamp with the inks that I use." This minimizes the affects of metamerism. Read this thread, and in particular the post by Hal Engel, maintainer of LPRof, where he says: " The Canon LIDe 20 (and some other scanners) use three light emitting diodes (one each red, green and blue) that results in a light spectrum that is very close to sun light. Metamerism is absolutely a function of light source as well as the reflecting surface. That's what most people came to think after their experiences with early EPSON pigment inks. Metamerism is a function of the paper and pigment, not the scanner.
#Canon lide 30 it8 target archive
Start digitize my film archive and didn't drop it". Understand why some people refer to 500f as "first flatbed I actually used to
That CIS sensors are weaker than CCDs in terms of color quality. ? Probably I'd get same with any CCD flatbed like 4200 or similar Epsonįlatbed, or CIS is making flatbed more able to scan film ? Some source mentioned Help make scanner thinner, eliminate warmup time and minimise energy consumpion I'm wondering if CIS sensor is adding to scanning quality or is just useful to OK, this flatbed isn't replacing film scanner, I knew this before. Impressed after recently retouching Reala (ok, 35mm) scanned on fs4000us. Occasional 4圆 prints, few frames worth enlarging I'd get scanned on filmĪfter quick research I've found few references to canon's LiDE 500f flatbed w/įilm adapter (now being replaced by 600f) and main statement is that this CIS I'd use flatbed to get scans for proofing and Recently I realized that develop only and scanning film myself would let me
0 kommentar(er)
